Christmas is to Hollywood what a bank is to a crook.Terry Teachout
Showing posts with label films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label films. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Sunday, December 05, 2010
The Past and the Future in Several Vintage American Films
I watched two old movies this weekend, one of which was a true classic, and the other not so much.
First, I went to a showing of The Wizard of Oz at a vintage local theater. The "big screen" makes a big difference. It was the first time in quite a while that I've been out to the movies, and I half-expected to look up and see the beams of light from the projector piercing the darkness above our heads, and even to hear the faint humm of the projector itself. I guess I'm the type of guy who misses that sort of thing.
The other old movie I watched this weekend (at home on dvd) was The Egg and I (1947), one of those utterly silly movies that is nevertheless interesting as a marker of its period.
Movies in the 30s and 40s often displayed a naive World-of-Tomorrow confidence about the future with alls its marvelous gadgetry and convenience. But at the same time there is often a somewhat contradictory longing for the idealized American past and/or the simple life. In the 1930s, the nostalgic longing for the past was a more likely theme, with movies often revealing a simmering discontent with the trend-lines into the future. On the other hand, in the post-war 40s the balance shifted toward the idealization of the future. Optimism about technology and economies of scale carry the day. Wizard, made in the tenth year of the depression and in the same year as the Nazi invasion of Poland, is really all about that longing for a simpler past, while (to take a seasonal example) It's a Wonderful Life (1946) in the end seems to imagine that in suburbia (the preeminent post-war idyll) these two contradictory longings will be perfectly reconciled. Family will be preserved, there will be harmony in diversity, the personal will win out over the impersonal.
In The Egg and I a city couple attempts to find happiness in country living (on a chicken farm), very much along the lines of the 60s TV show Green Acres. The farmhouse is a broken-down shack, with no indoor plumbing and a seriously leaky roof. The movie is very silly and full of more or less egregious stereotypes, of course. Produced in the optimistic post-war era (like It's a Wonderful Life), the longing for the pre-convenient simple life is here treated as noble yet unrealistic, and in the end (after some bizarre plot-twisting) the couple winds up with a chicken farm, yes, but also a beautiful modern home with all the desired conveniences. There, a happy ending!
Well, it wasn't the way of Hollywood in those days (the post-war 40s) to harbor reservations about modernity, which is one of the reasons, it seems to me, that the films of that decade are shallower than those of the 30s. In Wizard (1939) those reservations form a strong undercurrent. See also Make Way for Tomorrow (1937) and You Can't Take It with You (1938) for two films of the 30s in which those reservations are clearly on display.
First, I went to a showing of The Wizard of Oz at a vintage local theater. The "big screen" makes a big difference. It was the first time in quite a while that I've been out to the movies, and I half-expected to look up and see the beams of light from the projector piercing the darkness above our heads, and even to hear the faint humm of the projector itself. I guess I'm the type of guy who misses that sort of thing.
The other old movie I watched this weekend (at home on dvd) was The Egg and I (1947), one of those utterly silly movies that is nevertheless interesting as a marker of its period.
Movies in the 30s and 40s often displayed a naive World-of-Tomorrow confidence about the future with alls its marvelous gadgetry and convenience. But at the same time there is often a somewhat contradictory longing for the idealized American past and/or the simple life. In the 1930s, the nostalgic longing for the past was a more likely theme, with movies often revealing a simmering discontent with the trend-lines into the future. On the other hand, in the post-war 40s the balance shifted toward the idealization of the future. Optimism about technology and economies of scale carry the day. Wizard, made in the tenth year of the depression and in the same year as the Nazi invasion of Poland, is really all about that longing for a simpler past, while (to take a seasonal example) It's a Wonderful Life (1946) in the end seems to imagine that in suburbia (the preeminent post-war idyll) these two contradictory longings will be perfectly reconciled. Family will be preserved, there will be harmony in diversity, the personal will win out over the impersonal.
In The Egg and I a city couple attempts to find happiness in country living (on a chicken farm), very much along the lines of the 60s TV show Green Acres. The farmhouse is a broken-down shack, with no indoor plumbing and a seriously leaky roof. The movie is very silly and full of more or less egregious stereotypes, of course. Produced in the optimistic post-war era (like It's a Wonderful Life), the longing for the pre-convenient simple life is here treated as noble yet unrealistic, and in the end (after some bizarre plot-twisting) the couple winds up with a chicken farm, yes, but also a beautiful modern home with all the desired conveniences. There, a happy ending!
Well, it wasn't the way of Hollywood in those days (the post-war 40s) to harbor reservations about modernity, which is one of the reasons, it seems to me, that the films of that decade are shallower than those of the 30s. In Wizard (1939) those reservations form a strong undercurrent. See also Make Way for Tomorrow (1937) and You Can't Take It with You (1938) for two films of the 30s in which those reservations are clearly on display.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Two Classic Films
I tend to think older movies are almost always better movies. To my mind, the '30s were the golden age of film, the '40s weren't bad either, and it's been all downhill from there. In fact, most of my favorite films were made between 1936 and 1944.
Last night I watched The Shop Around the Corner
, made in 1940 and starring James Stewart and Margaret Sullavan. I love Stewart's early romantic comedies, and "Shop" is one of the finest. This is really a touching film about love and loneliness and the search for love, with fine ensemble actors.
Also, this weekend I watched Make Way for Tomorrow
, which is rather stunningly sad. I had expected something more comedic, but it turned out to be a commentary on the heartlessness of children toward their aging parents. The film has a kind of fatalism about it, without the usual "coming around" of the selfish characters which results in a righting of the wrong (see You Can't Take it with You
for probably the best example of this). Here, love does not conquer selfishness after all. Orson Welles called it the saddest movie ever made.
Last night I watched The Shop Around the Corner
, made in 1940 and starring James Stewart and Margaret Sullavan. I love Stewart's early romantic comedies, and "Shop" is one of the finest. This is really a touching film about love and loneliness and the search for love, with fine ensemble actors. Also, this weekend I watched Make Way for Tomorrow
, which is rather stunningly sad. I had expected something more comedic, but it turned out to be a commentary on the heartlessness of children toward their aging parents. The film has a kind of fatalism about it, without the usual "coming around" of the selfish characters which results in a righting of the wrong (see You Can't Take it with You for probably the best example of this). Here, love does not conquer selfishness after all. Orson Welles called it the saddest movie ever made.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)